When Do Investors Freak Out?: Machine Learning Predictions of Panic Selling
40 Pages Posted: 9 Aug 2021
Daniel Elkind
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Kathryn Kaminski
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Andrew W. Lo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Laboratory for Financial Engineering; Santa Fe Institute
Kien Wei Siah
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Laboratory for Financial Engineering
Chi Heem Wong
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL); Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management
Date Written: August 4, 2021
Abstract
Despite standard investment advice to the contrary, individuals often engage in panic selling, liquidating significant portions of their risky assets in response to large losses.Using a novel dataset of 653,455 individual brokerage accounts belonging to 298,556 households, we document the frequency, timing, and duration of panic sales, which wedefine as a decline of 90% of a household account’s equity assets over the course of onemonth, of which 50% or more is due to trades. We find that a disproportionate numberof households make panic sales when there are sharp market downturns, a phenomenonwe call ‘freaking out’. We show that panic selling and freakouts are predictable andfundamentally different from other well-known behavioral patterns such as overtradingor the disposition effect. Investors who are male, or above the age of 45, or married, orhave more dependents, or who self-identify as having excellent investment experience orknowledge tend to freak out with greater frequency. We use a five-layer neural networkmodel to predict freakout events one month in advance, given recent market conditionsand an investor’s demographic attributes and financial history, which exhibited truenegative and positive accuracy rates of 81.5% and 69.5%, respectively, in an out-of-sample test set. We measure the opportunity of cost of panic sales and find that, whilefreaking out does protect investors during a crisis, such investors often wait too longto reinvest, causing them to miss out on significant profits when markets rebound.
Keywords: Panic Selling; Stop-Loss; Tactical Asset Allocation; Freaking Out; Deep Learning; Behavioral Finance
JEL Classification: G11, G01, G02, D14, D91
Suggested Citation:
35 References
- Shima Amini, Bartosz Gebka, Robert Hudson, Kevin Keasey
A review of the international literature on the short term predictability of stock prices conditional on large prior price changes: Microstructure, behavioral and risk related explanations
International Review of Financial Analysis, volume 26, p. 1 - 17CrossrefPosted: 2013 - Malcolm Baker, Jeffrey Wurgler
Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns
The Journal of Finance, volume 61, issue 4, p. 1645 - 1680CrossrefPosted: 2006 - G Turan, Bali, Haim Ozgur Demirtas, Levy
Is there an intertemporal relation between downside risk and expected returns?
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, volume 44, issue 4, p. 883 - 909Posted: 2009 - M Brad, Terrance Barber, Odean
Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors
The Journal of Finance, volume 55, issue 2, p. 773 - 806Posted: 2000
SSRN Quick Links
SSRN Rankings
We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content.
To learn more, visit
.