Skip to content

Walton Enterprises LLC – The Family Holding Company of Sam Walton and the Walton Family

You are here:
  1. /Home
  2. /Business Management
  3. /Case Studies & Profiles
  4. /Walton Enterprises LLC – The…

Sam Walton’s heirs have an estimated net worth of more than $90 billion. To put that into perspective, the Walton family is as rich as Bill Gates and Warren buffet combined. Virtually all of this wealth came from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the publicly traded company that operates as the world’s largest retailer, bringing in a staggering $400+ billion in annual revenue.

[mainbodyad]What most people don’t know is that almost all of the family’s fortune is held through private holding company known as Walton Enterprises LLC that serves as the investment vehicle for the family. Sam Walton was smart enough to know that he didn’t just want to own retail stores – he bought banks, newspapers, and other assets along the way. It just so happens that same holding company is the vehicle through which he wielded control of his retail empire and that it became so successful, people associated him with it. Had Wal-Mart been just another regional retailer, though, the Walton family would have still ended up rich from their diversified investments.

Today, Walton Enterprises LLC Is Funded By Wal-Mart Dividends and Other Subsidiaries

Walton Enterprises LLC is the modern day incarnation of early ownership structures including a limited partnership through which Sam and his family owned their assets. Throughout the year, members of the Walton family meet to discuss how they want to handle the money held within Walton Enterprises LLC. Each year, the company generates billions in dividend income that they need to decide how to redeploy.

You can learn more about the history of Wal-Mart and his life in the Sam Walton – Made in America autobiography. Click on the image to see the product page at, where it is really inexpensive.

How big are those dividends? Walton Enterprises LLC owns an estimated 1,680,506,739 shares of Wal-Mart stock. The entire Wal-Mart company is divided into 3,636,547,192 shares. That means that the family holds somewhere around 46.2% of the firm with other investors owning the other 57.4%. We know that Wal-Mart Stores pays a dividend of $1.21 per share. That means that the family holding company, Walton Enterprises LLC, collects a staggering $2,033,413,154+ before taxes each year in dividend income.

To put that in perspective, Walton Enterprises earns almost $5,570,995 in pre-tax dividend every 24 hours! And that doesn’t even include the other investments, which we will discuss in a moment.

In addition to their equity stake in Walton Enterprises LLC, each of the individual family members owns somewhere between 2.8 million and 11 million shares of Wal-Mart Stores stock outright, in their own name. It is reasonable to assume that the dividend income on those shares would go directly to each owner, who could use it to support their lifestyle, give to charity or build their own investments. Much of this was bought by the Walton children along the way or at the time of the Wal-Mart IPO.

There are also a series of charitable foundations, trusts and other structures that aren’t publicly known, through which the Walton family holds investments that serve to support worthy causes.

The Walton Family Diversifies Walton Enterprises LLC’s Investments (Newspapers, Banks, etc.)

Not content to just own his retail store, Sam Walton and his family did what any successful entrepreneur does when he finds himself in possession of more cash after having a good year: They invested it in something.

[mainbodyad]They founded Arvest Bank and began rolling out bank branches throughout the states surrounding Arkansas. Some of the bank branches are found within Wal-Mart stores and they even have a service that helps Wal-Mart employees deal with their stock options.

Well … actually back in the 1980’s there was a rumor (but I don’t know if it is true or not) that Walton bought a bank that turned him down for a loan to expand Wal-Mart when he was first starting his company. He then fired the entire staff. He figured if they were too stupid to tell that he was a good risk, they wouldn’t be good bankers. Like I said, it may just be an urban legend, but even if it is, it’s a nice story.

Today, Arvest has 200+ bank branches, $11+ billion in assets, and a $1+ billion net worth. In fact, in only a few short years it is likely that the Arvest bank holding alone would qualify the Walton family for inclusion on the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans, even if Wal-Mart didn’t exist.

Sam Walton also bought the Benton County Daily Record, which allowed Sam to publish Wal-Mart advertisements at almost no cost. The company now operates under the parent Community Publishers, which is owned by Walton Enterprises LLC. He then started buying up newspapers back in the days when they offered 40%+ profit margins, giving him another source of passive income.

This has lead to an interesting concentration of power in the hands of the Walton family in Northwest Arkansas. Consider what Fortune magazine wrote in 2004:

Consider for a moment the power that Wal-Mart and the Walton family hold in the northwest corner of their state. It’s not unlikely that an individual works at Wal-Mart, owns Wal-Mart stock in his 401(k), banks and has his mortgage at Jim Walton’s Arvest, gets his news from the Benton County Daily Record, and perhaps even has a subscription to the Walton Arts Center. While a few people have complained about this concentration of power, generally the populace has no objections. The Waltons have done well to maintain a level of independence among these operations. (The Benton County Daily Record, for instance, recently ran some anti-Wal-Mart ads paid for by a group in Vermont.) And because of the Waltons’ success in business— and that of people like Tyson and Hunt— Bentonville and the surrounding towns and counties are growing so fast that most folks are just too busy to care.

The Reasons I Like the Walton Enterprises LLC Business Model

Sam Walton began his small retailer in Bentonville, Arkansas. When Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. later went public, he held most of his shares through a family holding company called Walton Enterprises LLC, which was divided among him, his wife, and his four children. Today, that family holding company owns more than $90 billion worth of Wal-Mart stock, receives more than $2 billion a year in dividend income, owns a bank with assets in excess of $11 billion and more.

One of the things I think is beneficial about the Walton Enterprises LLC business model is that it forces the family to act and think like a unit. Everything is done by consensus and they speak three times a year about how they are managing their fortune. In fact, it has been reported that the officers and managers of the publicly traded Wal-Mart Stores give a presentation on the state of the business directly to the Walton clan every Christmas.

If the entire Walton family votes not to pay a dividend out of Walton Enterprises, then the money gets retained. One rogue person couldn’t take the entire thing down … they are a clan and have always been such.

But what makes me love this country is that all of that immense wealth came from a tiny five-and-dime store in the middle of nowhere by a guy with almost no money but a lot of drive. The family retained their earnings, lived modestly, and loved what they did. They weren’t buying gold-plated faucets or $2,000 cashmere sweaters. They just wanted to be the best merchants in the towns where they competed. They focused on the small things, day in and day out, and over time, compounding did the rest.

They didn’t cheat. They didn’t steal. Everyone else was free to invest in distribution systems like they did to lower costs. They started with enormous disadvantages compared to Sears and K-Mart. And yet, they won. Wal-Mart is so efficient that 70% of the merchandise is sold to customers before the company has even paid the vendor for it! Anyone intelligent enough to see what he was building back in the 1970’s got very, very rich by buying the stock. In fact, if a competitor had realized how successful Wal-Mart was, sold their inventory and shut down their store, putting the money from the liquidation into shares of Sam’s company, they would likely be multi-millionaires today.

As shown in the Walmart annual report to stockholders, the company is one of the most successful enterprises in the history of the world – it is almost unbelievable how it has grown from a tiny five-and-dime. In fact, just walking into a Walmart makes me happy because I think of what it took for Sam Walton and his family to build it. It is a testament to all that is good and right about the United States. The Walton family controls Wal-Mart Stores through Walton Enterprises, LLC.

It is like I explained to the Dairy Queen franchisee over at, a division of The New York Times in an article called How to Turn $10 a Week into $10 Million. Someone in a small town could start a holding company, and even if they just reinvested a small amount annually – say $25,000 – at the average return on book value of 12% (since they are the only owner and effectively paying 1x book, this would be their return) – they would have almost exactly $60,000,000 in fifty years.

Why do you think that I spend so much time driving my family members to save during their 20’s? I know if I can get them in control of assets around the time they are 30, inertia will take over and, short of doing something spectacularly stupid, they should end up rich, even if they have no interest in finance or stocks like I do.

Oh, yeah … and my favorite part of the Wal-Mart story? Sam Walton was 44 years old when he founded the company. He wasn’t a spring chicken. Just like Rose Blumkin, who was in her 40’s when she founded Nebraska Furniture Mart, which is worth hundreds of millions of dollars today, you are never too old to start. Even if you have nothing right now, you aren’t a "loser" unless you stop playing the game … you are just temporarily knocked down. As long as you keep pressing "restart" and you are alive, you only have to do it right and get rich once. It doesn’t matter how many failure attempts it takes to get there.

The Walton Family Fortune – Destined for Charity?

Ultimately, many Walton watchers expect the bulk of the Walton Enterprises LLC assets to go to charity. Comment Policy

If you are having trouble with Disqus, or your comment is not appearing, check out our Comment Policy.

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Join the discussion…

  • I've hit my restart button so many times, but have failed only because I procrastinate. Now, if only there was an easy pill I could take. I have to say, shaking off laziness and procrastination is one of the hardest things to do. Motivation is there, goals are there, but I find I get overwhelmed and then put things off. I find myself thinking at times, "it's too hard!" But that just gives me an excuse to put it off again. Hmmm. It would be nice to be able to figure out psychologically why procrastinators can never seem to get anything done, even with the best of intentions.


          • 5% would go to charity

              • Josh Hill 9 years ago edited

                I believe that everyone should have this type of success. This adrenaline of success is what I get up for despite of all the negative bias, wars, financial crashes, The Great Recession, and other hurricanes. Take Nikola Tesla, a man who out of nowhere defeated Thomas Edison from nothing but a joke Edison told Tesla. I will keep on pressing the restart button as many times as I have to. Running a business is one of few ways to get successful, rich, and proud about your life. Good thing I am a "spring chicken".

                For me this the phrase that changed me.

                "Everyone wants to be rich, but no one wants to work for it"

                It is maybe tied for my love of simulation/strategy games and games that have no end or require immense thought, because every time I play I want to play until I am bored, that is satisfaction for me knowing that got the value out the game. I personally dislike games that have a set campaign because it is always someone's story. Maybe I will create a game were YOU write the story. I will create a business that fulfills me life to happiness no matter the cost. Dang I might just have to sign a contract for security. Because as you know Job Security is a illusion, I know that I am just as likely to lose my job as my business so I believe "whats the point of a job" even though we would suffer from the "Too many Chiefs not enough Indians" I believe we are in a "Too many Indians not enough Chiefs"Job market.

                Say Joshua, do you ever get bored with you business, or is like a never ending exciting game?

                  • Great article, especially the last part about not quitting.

                      • Spain255 10 years ago

                        If all you care about is money, then Wal-Mart is definately for you...Such a horrible outfit...The Waltons truly believe they can "take it with them". I go out of my way to NOT buy from Wal-Mart regardless if it costs more. P.S- Not everything in Wal-Mart is cheaper.

                          • Joshua Kennon Moderator > Spain255 10 years ago edited

                            I tend to like, and even feel affection, for Walmart for one simple reason. If you are the typical American family, they save you $1,500 to $2,000 per year.

                            To an honest, hard working school janitor who is doing the best he can for his kids, or to a young, single mother working double shifts at a diner, that is real money. That is money that can make life much better; pay for a vacation, get a new television, purchase school supplies, or cover car repairs.

                            To someone like me, that isn't a lot of money. I am fortunate, and blessed, enough to not have to worry about putting food on the table or paying health care costs.

                            For me to condemn them as being "greedy", or to criticize Walmart for actions that directly benefit the poorest of the poor, is a special type of arrogance and elitism. It is easy for me to make such condemnations. Those families are making economic choices that are rational to their situations. They can't afford Fair Trade coffee or Made in the USA furniture. What are they supposed to do?

                            If someone can't compete against Walmart, they should go into a different line of business. The horse and buggy manufacturers said the same thing when Henry Ford made the car affordable to the masses. Not everything is so simple. It's easy to tell people they should behave differently, especially when one has the luxury of not having to worry about the consequences.

                              • Joshua, you are a bit confused about the Ford and Walton business plans.

                                Henry Ford found ways to be innovative such as requiring parts' suppliers to ship parts to the Ford plants in containers meeting certain specifications so they could be used as a part of the current model being built such as floors or door panels. But Henry Ford is better known for his innovative policy of paying his employees much above the going rate of pay in order to create a market for automobiles Ford was building. His competitors hated him because they had to raise the wages of their employees.

                                The Waltons, on the other hand, don't give a damn about their employees or perhaps I should note, they teach their employees how to go to the government for food stamps, medical assistance, etc. in order to keep body and soul together. The Walton family members could very well limit their profit taking to merely obscene amounts and pay their employees enough to provide food, shelter, and medical care for their families.

                                The Waltons insist on keeping their employees poverty stricken so they have no where to go, as opposed to Henry Ford who paid enough to encourage his employees to enjoy a better life style. I am not saying that Henry Ford was a paragon of virtue, but compared with the Waltons, he was god.

                                  • EEvans > skayjo 8 years ago

                                    Did you ask ALL Walmart associates if they are on government assistance? I think not. I have never accepted a handout, or government assistance. Walmart is a great company with good wages and great benefits. Maybe people like you need to do your research and not speak off hear-say!

                                      • Joshua Kennon Moderator > skayjo 9 years ago edited

                                        I get what you're saying; I do. It's not that I'm confused - believe me when I say I am intimately familiar with both empires - the problem is that a discussion about the issue requires tens of thousands of words and will get into a lot of economic and financial information that would be easier to talk about in person.

                                        The short version is this: Given the current operating margins at Wal-Mart, and the price points of its competitors in the market, there is absolutely no way Wal-Mart could pay living wages to its employees and avoid a massive fiduciary problem from its owners (half of whom are not the Walton family as it's one of the biggest stocks in the S&P 500; odds are). I explain the mechanics of the underlying cause in this analysis contrasting Goldman Sachs and Wal-Mart Stores. It has to do with a financial metric known as "operating profit per employee".

                                        In the final analysis, I can see no way, none, for Wal-Mart to offer substantially higher wages short of a national increase in the minimum wage that affects all of its competitors at the same time so the competitive effects are not problematic. Henry Ford did not have this problem given the nature of the market share and operating margins per employee that were in effect at the time he made the decision you reference.

                                        The other issues involve a psychological phenomenon that results in people seeing Wal-Mart as the problem, when the same situation existed prior to its rise, it was simply dispersed among many more employers, making it difficult to pinpoint a single one.

                                        Some point to Costco, which has a high-wage, low-turnover model. It works there because the clubhouses are membership only and backed by billions of dollars in annual fees, which augment the existing pricing strategy and offer different products than you can get from Big Lots or the neighborhood grocery store. An apples-to-apples comparison doesn't work on the SKU and financial statement levels.

                                        The problem is only going to get worse for Wal-Mart workers, for what it's worth, because a significant percentage of sales over the past few decades has come from things such as software, music, video games, books, etc. Now, all of those products are being digitized in a direct-to-consumer model, cutting out the middle of the distribution chain (Wal-Mart), which will require, if my thesis turns out to be correct based on the evidence I see buried in the 10Ks of those industries as they reconfigure their models, some changes in the average store size and / or total employees per location as the population growth isn't sufficient to offset what I think is going to be significant product mix shift necessitated by technology.

                                        And then there is the thing that is discussed in private among economists and academics but rarely admitted in public: It's generally considered a bad idea to have a society in which menial, low-skill work can earn a wage sufficient to support a family as the jobs are meant to be filled by temporary workers (e.g., college students and newly divorced spouses) as a stop-gap to skill improvement. Human nature being what it is, these types of employment slots are absolutely vital to a thriving economy and the unspoken point is to make them somewhat unappealing. In other words, corner a decent, respected economist and he'll finally admit that no one is supposed to work a checkout line for more than 3 or 4 years of their life. If, after years, someone hasn't moved up or acquired other human capital, the general consensus is they - I know this sounds horrible, but it's what is said when the door is closed - "get what they deserve". (Keep in mind, when discussing policy decisions, most of these people are not cruel or uncaring, they are thinking about the overall national economy like a well-functioning clock without any concern for the individual cogs as the well-being over the overall system must take primacy, just like the Supreme Court is concerned with precedent and constitutional consistency, not justice.)

                                        That aside, the Waltons couldn't limit their profit taking unilaterally. The other 50% owners - the pension funds, unions, private investors, universities, and other stockholders - would throw management out following the first drop in long-term continuing operating profit and put someone in place who keeps making the earnings figures climb higher. It's not a private business. Their opinion is not the only one that matters. People would be especially wary of a major business model change given the destruction of J.C. Penney, which has retail investors, in general, terrified at the moment.

                                        Granted, I'm not saying any of this is right, or even advisable; just that it is far more complicated than you are factoring into the equation, with various constituencies and macroeconomic forces influencing the incentive system that leads to the current status quo.

                                        Regardless, the economist in me can't help but recognize the sheer fact that Walmart saves American families, in the aggregate, far more in groceries and household supplies than it costs in low wages to its employees, who represent a mere fraction of the population base. That's yet another complicating factor, especially since those savings accrue to the poor and working poor as the rich don't tend to shop there (I'm no exception - I opt for an employee-owned grocery store where prices are higher because I like that they get a better standard of living and I can buy ridiculously expensive imported cheeses and fresh ingredients.) It seems arrogant of me to tell more than a hundred million working families to pay more they can't afford so a handful of jobs designed to be transient in nature can become permanent employment. I just don't think I have that level of hubris in me because I'm far removed from the day-to-day struggles the working class faces.

                                        On a personal and moral level, I would not agree with your analysis of Ford being a paragon of virtue. He had his good points, but in a lot of ways, the man was a complete jackass. Between his personal bigotry and some of his behavior, he is not someone I think a person should seek to emulate in a lot of ways. Sam Walton, on the other hand, was a far better man (the company that now carries his name is radically different than the one he left when he died roughly a quarter-of-a-century ago and I can't speak to the behavior of his heirs or firm today as I do have some criticism of some of the actions that have taken place over the past few years), with a far better personal reputation, and a much better legacy with his own children and grandchildren.

                                          see more
                                    • less than 5% foreign in all Wal*Mart's in China....

                                      enough said....

                                        • Great article! I am going to work for a holding company beginning next week. I am VERY excited about it!

                                          Search The Blog
                                          Browse By Category
                                          Browse By Category
                                          Browse By Date
                                          Browse By Date
                                          Search the Blog
                                          Copyright © Joshua Kennon. All Rights Reserved.