Liability Insurance For All
The world’s first modern limited liability law was enacted by the state of New York in 1811. In England … investors in such companies carried unlimited liability until the Limited Liability Act of 1855. There was a degree of public and legislative distaste for a limitation of liability, with fears that it would cause a drop in standards of probity. … Limited liability has been justified as promoting investment and capital formation by reassuring risk averse investors. … Others argue that while some limited liability is beneficial, the privilege ought not to extend to liability in tort for environmental disasters or personal injury. (more)
General Liability Insurance: Every business, even if home-based, needs to have liability insurance. The policy provides both defense and damages if you, your employees or your products or services cause or are alleged to have caused Bodily Injury or Property Damage to a third party. (more)
If a court finds you guilty and demands that you pay, you are on the hook to pay everything you’ve got. Same for most small businesses. But investors in big firms instead get to play "heads I win, tails we flip again". If the firm does well they can win cash, but if the firm behaves badly, the court can only take what they’ve put into the firm. That is, the court can extract money that is in the firm, but can’t push further to get more from investors. This usually doesn’t sit well those inclined toward suspicion of big firms; why subsidize big for-profit firms relative to other forms of social organization?
The usual argument for limited liability is that without it investors would be reluctant to invest. Which makes sense and plausibly explains the initial introduction of limited liability. But that happened before the rise of the modern insurance industry. Now that insurance is easy, the obvious solution is liability insurance. Then in case of a court demanding a large payment, the insurance company pays, and the investors are insulated. Small businesses today typically buy such insurance as a matter of good practice, and many contracts with other businesses require them to have it.
Today we require auto accident liability insurance for car drivers. And recently some have proposed requiring gun owners to have liability insurance regarding their gun use. Insurers would then discourage risky people from owning guns, and help others reduce their risk. But many gun owners see this as a back hand way to tax guns; why should guns be singled out relative to lots of other risky products?
Yes, if we require liability insurance for some products and organizations but not others, we are implicitly subsidizing and taxing some relative to others. The obvious simple solution is to require everyone to get liability insurance for everything. The insurance could stand ready to pay the 99th percentile amount demanded of that sort of person or organization. Then we aren’t favoring any particular activity or organization type. And then some new interesting reforms become possible.
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Opinion Entrenchment
- DIY vs. PFR Matchmaking
- Seeing ANYTHING Other Than Huge-Civ Is Bad News
- You Don’t Want To Know Your Limit
- The Coming Cosmic Control Conflict
- Replace Govt As Career Agent
- We Moderns Are Status-Drunk
- UFOs – What The Hell?
- Report UFOs as Physical Likelihood Ratios
- Give Tyler His Due
Recent Comments
- Arch1
To the extent to which the various causes of opinion entrenchment have tended to estimably influence securities pricing, I guess that they have mostly been arbitraged out. The analogous thing in...
- Ben Finn
Hiding from advanced observation tech might well be an option with advanced hiding tech. We don't know at present. The top predator may not know they're the top predator - especially if others are...
- Philon
It is annoying to publish something that is clearly right, and have it ignored by people who persist in accepting the wrong alternative that you have refuted. But if you can understand this...
- Donald Hobson
Its too strong not to leave other effects. 10^37 every second is a ridiculous force towards being as early as possible. If that was actually true, we would live in a would that appeared at the...
- Jonathan Starr
Once more into the breach dear friends!
- A. Ott
If this were happening 10 years ago, I would head to Jerry Pournelle's old site and read what he and his correspondents have to say on the subject. That ain't happening, so here is my short...
- Morris39
Living organisms seem to be intrinsically constituted to deceive. Folly of Fools by Robert Trivers offers an excellent explanation. That explanation addresses twisting reason by individuals. Why...
- Miquel
38 counts still as young? Thanks.
- jcs
The obvious big question here is: how can we best change our styles of thought, talk, and interaction to correct for the biases that entrenchment induces?
Isn't that the...
- RobinHanson
If you lived in a dorm, the professional would decorate your home at the same time that they decorated hundreds of others, by doing them all similarly. That way is vastly cheaper.
- myst_05
Re: DIY. I'm personally happy to let a "professional" decorate my home but it just costs way too much to do so. I'm happy to use professionally designed furniture from IKEA though because its...
- Simon Farmer
I definitely worry about entrenchment, even outside of academic investigation. At my best I hope the entrenchment of a certain opinion is because I've gotten years of evidence that support it....
- RobinHanson
Fixed.
- RobinHanson
You are young; you will learn.
- Miquel
I'm not believing what I have read. Maybe it's something cultural. For me, loving (or even 'just' caring for) somebody entails wanting them to feel good, to be happy; not to exploit them to the...
- Brian Holtz
I assume you meant "the high rate of material transfer between early Earth and early Mars" instead of "life transfer".
- akarlin
Brilliant point. If the share of alien civilizations that become obsessed with optimizing for qualia is high, then most civilizations will be small. (Expansion ceases to have much point - if...
- Ruler Francis
For example, people often say "I just can’t believe Fred’s dead", meaning not that the evidence of Fred’s death isn’t sufficient, but that it will take a lot of work to think through...
- Aaron Stewart
For a few years I've harbored a theory that one of the key ways our beliefs become entrenched is simply by stating them. Situations arise where we have cause to explain some belief we have, and...
- Robert A Koslover
Re: "...haven’t I already considered enough weird stuff for one person?" Yes! Yes, you have, and I doubt any reader here will disagree. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't do even more. And more is...
Popular Tags
Blogroll
- Andrew Gelman
- Andy McKenzie
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Bayesian Investor Blog
- Carl Shulman
- Certain Doubts
- Choice and Inference
- Colin Marshall
- David Friedman
- Decline Of Scarcity
- EconLog
- Eric Barker
- Eric Drexler
- Eric Falkenstein
- Experimental Philosophy
- Gene Expression
- George Dvorsky
- Jess Riedel
- Katja Grace
- Kevin Simler
- Less Wrong
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Ridley
- Megan McArdle
- Modeled Behavior
- Offsetting Behaviour
- Paul Christiano
- Philosophy, et cetera
- Practical Ethics
- Preposterous Universe
- Randall Collins
- Robert Kurzban
- Robert Wiblin
- Scott Alexander
- Seth Roberts
- Shtetl-Optimized
- Steven Landsburg
- Thoughts Arguments and Rants
- Will Wilkinson